Management of the woman with a prior caesarean delivery is a controversial issue.
Previously it was thought that an uterus with scar is a contraindication for labor because of the chances of rupture of uterus.
Previously it was thought that an uterus with scar is a contraindication for labor because of the chances of rupture of uterus.
In
olden days classical vertical uterine incision was used, so at that
time the quote by Cragin "Once a cesarean, always a cesarean" was
right.
Nowadays many changes have come in the technique of caesarean delivery and also the emergencies are being handled successfully, so concept of trail of labor in people with prior caesarean has came.
Nowadays many changes have come in the technique of caesarean delivery and also the emergencies are being handled successfully, so concept of trail of labor in people with prior caesarean has came.
The effect of prior caesarean delivery on present pregnancy:
Prior
caesarean delivery may not significantly alter the course of present
pregnancy or labor but it may increase some complications like:
Abortion:
as in the uterus with scar when the gestational sac gets implanted over
the scar, the implantation may not occur properly leading to abortion.
Preterm labor:
when the uterus go on stretching due to the growth of the fetus, the
scar tissue may not expand as much as normal myometrium leading to
establishment of preterm labor.
Increase in normal pregnancy features: eg.
because of the presence of adhesions in between the abdominal
structures the tightening of normal pregnancy may become painful, also
frequency of urination in pregnancy may become exaggerated because of
adhesions between bladder and uterus.
Increased operative interference:
because of recurrent indications again patient may land up in caesarean
delivery or because of fear of scar dehiscence in trial of labor second
stage may be cut short with instrumental delivery. All these will
increase maternal and fetal morbidity.
Retained placenta and postpartum hemorrhage: if
the placenta gets implanted on previous scar the chances of developing
placenta accreta etc are common leading to retained placenta which will
also lead to postpartum hemorrhage.
The effect of present pregnancy on scar:
The chances of scar dehiscence or rupture are there.
In
case of lower segment caesarean section the scar can rupture during
delivery usually. The incidence is 1 to 2%. In case of classical
caesarean section or in case of hysterectomy the scar can rupture in
late pregnancy or during labor. The incidence is 5 to 10%.
The
success of trail of labor depends mainly on the strength of the
previous scar, which depends on the healing of the scar. Healing occurs
with muscles and connective tissue. Perfect apposition of the cut
margins should be there.
The healing may be affected by following factors:
When the apposition is not perfect:
some times because of ragged edges or because of giving incision above
the usual site which will lead to thick edges the apposition may not
come perfectly affecting the healing.
Presence of infection:
in case of chorioamnionitis or any type of sepsis either because of
prolonged labor or because of iatrogenic reasons the healing of the scar
will be affected.
Haematoma in the layers of the wound: the undiagnosed hematoma in the layers of the wound will lead to improper apposition and also hamper the healing of the wound.
General condition of the patient:
in case of poor general condition of the patient like with severe
anaemia or with severe infection etc will affect the healing of the
scar.
Previous labor to delivery interval:
in case of previous prolonged labor to delivery time there will be
excessive stretching of lower uterine segment leading to diminished
vascularity to the muscles also prolonged labor can lead to development of infection these will affect the strength of the scar.
Type of the scar: the type of the scar also influence the healing and strength of the scar.
The
lower segment scar can be taken as sound scar because thin margins will
lead to good approximation, during healing process the lower uterine
segment will remain inert, during pregnancy and labor the stretching
will occur along the line of scar, placental attachment on scar at lower
uterine segment is less, rupture may occur only during labor with less maternal and perinatal mortality.
In case of the classical or hysterectomy scar thick margins containing blood and retained deciduas may lead to improper approximation, during healing process the upper uterine segment will contract and retract disturbing
the sutures, during pregnancy and labor the stretching will occur at
right angles to the scar, placental attachment on scar is more likely
leading to weakness of scar, rupture may occur both during pregnancy and during labor with high maternal and perinatal mortality.
So, either elective section to be done or can be allowed for vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is decided after considering following factors:
As classical caesarean section scar or hysterectomy scar are not considered to be sound in these cases better to go for elective caesarean section.
In
case of lower segment caesarean section VBAC can be allowed if the scar
is expected to be sound but elective caesarean section to be considered
if,
In case the previous section was done by a surgeon with low technical skill the chances of good approximation of edges are doubtful.
If prior section was done for the indication of placenta praevia
as the surgery to be completed quickly to prevent blood loss the
approximation may not be good, placental sinuses may prone to thrombosis
and further sepsis because of being close to vagina.
In case of prolonged labor in previous pregnancy can lead to development of sepsis and weakening of scar.
If the previous caesarean section was difficult section
with extension of edges either laterally or involving blood vessels or
ending in colporrhexis the scar may not be sound and chances of rupture
are there.
In women who undergone caesarean section with having uterine malformations like unicornuate, bicornuate, didelphic or septate uteru the chances of rupture are more.
The risk of uterine rupture in women with a prior vertical incision
that did not extend into the fundus is controversial. Women with a
prior vertical incision in the lower uterine segment without fundal
extension may be taken for VBAC. This is in contrast to prior classical or T-shaped uterine incisions, which are considered contraindications to VBAC.
In case of prior section was done in preterm
with a poorly developed lower uterine segment the incision may almost
invariably extended into the active upper segment. So, better to go fore
elective section this time.
If the present pregnancy occurred soon
that is within 6 months of prior section, the chances of weakening of
scar are there. Ideally at least 2 years of gap should be there between
two pregnancies.
If present pregnancy is associated with obstetric complications
like multiple gestation or polyhydromnios etc which will lead to
stretching of the scar and also if conditions loke placenta praevia,
severe pre eclampsia or malpresentations exit elective section to be
considered.
Prior cesarean pregnancy with placenta previa |
Vaginal delivery after caesarean section may lead to weakening of scar.
If placenta in present pregnancy is present in the lower anterior segment attached to prior scar there may be abnormal adherence of placenta which will make operative interference necessary.
If there are more than one prior section before this pregnancy better to choose elective section.
If the estimated weight of the baby is more than 4 kg or appears to be big to that particular pelvis trail of labor may not become successful.
If hysterography finding in the interconceptional period shows wedge depression of more than 5 mm in the scar the chances of rupture are more.
If previous indication was recurrent indication like contracted pelvis or cephlo pelvic disproportion this time elective section to be opted.
Management of prior caesarean cases:
These cases to be considered high risk cases and frequent antenatal checkups to be taken.
In
every visit have to ask for any pain over the scar or bleeding per
vaginum, in examination any tenderness over the scar to be elicited.
In case of prior classical caesarean section or patients expected to have weak scars to be admitted at 36 weeks as chances of rupture are more during last weeks of pregnancy. The repeat section can be performed after 38 completed weeks.
In case of prior lower uterine segment caesarean section the patients can be admitted at 38 weeks, so that patient can be examined thoroughly and mode of delivery can be planned.
In case vaginal delivery
is planned it should be done under strict supervision with preparation
to shift to operation theatre if needed. Impending signs of dehiscence
to be monitored. Epidural ananlgesia is better avoided as it will mask
the signs of scar dehiscence. Second stage can be curtailed with
prophylactic forceps. Exploration of scar can be done in only selective
cases like continued bleeding inspite of well contracted uterus.if
performed under ideal circumstances the results of VBAC and repeat
caesarean section are identical. If good observation cannot be
maintained better to go for elective section.
If any symptoms of the scar dehiscence
like supra pubic dull aching pain even in between contractions, slight
vaginal bleeding, frequent desire to pass urine etc along with signs
like tachycardia with falling blood pressure, fetal heart rate
fluctuations, tenderness over the uterine scar, labour not progressing
without any reason, ballooning of lower uterine segment, taking up of
cervix etc, the patient to be immediately shifted to operation theatre
and caesarean section to be done.
If the patient is undergoing third caesarean section sterilization to be considered strictly unless there is very strong indication to not to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment